<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>In Through The Out Door &#187; Military</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anyhat.net/blog/category/military/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anyhat.net/blog</link>
	<description>Diving Through The Information Barrage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 05:50:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>DOD Cyberspace Strategy is Too Narrow, Too Negative</title>
		<link>http://anyhat.net/blog/2011/08/07/dod-cyberspace-strategy-is-too-narrow-too-negative/</link>
		<comments>http://anyhat.net/blog/2011/08/07/dod-cyberspace-strategy-is-too-narrow-too-negative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 23:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stexas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[H@xor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anyhat.net/blog/2011/08/07/dod-cyberspace-strategy-is-too-narrow-too-negative/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DOD Cyberspace Strategy is Too Narrow, Too Negative]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://anyhat.net/blog/2011/08/07/dod-cyberspace-strategy-is-too-narrow-too-negative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Cyber Command becomes &#8216;fully operational&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://anyhat.net/blog/2010/11/04/us-cyber-command-becomes-fully-operational/</link>
		<comments>http://anyhat.net/blog/2010/11/04/us-cyber-command-becomes-fully-operational/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stexas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[H@xor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anyhat.net/blog/2010/11/04/us-cyber-command-becomes-fully-operational/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[US Cyber Command becomes &#8216;fully operational&#8217;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://anyhat.net/blog/2010/11/04/us-cyber-command-becomes-fully-operational/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NSA initiating program to detect cyberattacks</title>
		<link>http://anyhat.net/blog/2010/07/08/nsa-initiating-program-to-detect-cyberattacks/</link>
		<comments>http://anyhat.net/blog/2010/07/08/nsa-initiating-program-to-detect-cyberattacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stexas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H@xor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anyhat.net/blog/2010/07/08/nsa-initiating-program-to-detect-cyberattacks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NSA initiating program to detect cyberattacks]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://anyhat.net/blog/2010/07/08/nsa-initiating-program-to-detect-cyberattacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese NETFOO</title>
		<link>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/10/29/chinese-netfoo/</link>
		<comments>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/10/29/chinese-netfoo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stexas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[H@xor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/10/29/chinese-netfoo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[China Will Outsmart You China raising a cyber army?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/10/29/chinese-netfoo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Collaborative Cyber Command</title>
		<link>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/10/01/collaborative-cyber-command/</link>
		<comments>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/10/01/collaborative-cyber-command/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stexas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[H@xor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/10/01/collaborative-cyber-command/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Few people would dispute the huge challenge facing the newly formed Cyber Command. Perhaps the greatest of these challenges is in the area of coordination and collaboration. The addition of collaboration and coordination was evident in an organization chart for Cyber Command (marked FOUO) that has been circulating around by regular email (go figure) for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/10/01/collaborative-cyber-command/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Navy Scientists Develop Laser For Underwater Communication</title>
		<link>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/09/07/navy-scientists-develop-laser-for-underwater-communication/</link>
		<comments>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/09/07/navy-scientists-develop-laser-for-underwater-communication/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 22:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stexas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Submarines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/09/07/navy-scientists-develop-laser-for-underwater-communication/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Researchers at the Naval Research Laboratory claim to have come up with a better tool for underwater acoustics. The new system uses laser light to create sound underwater from a distance. This technology could allow planes a much easier method of communicating with submarines without the need for a floating buoy. &#8220;Efficient conversion of light [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/09/07/navy-scientists-develop-laser-for-underwater-communication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Air Force Establishes ‘Reduced’ Cyber-War Command</title>
		<link>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/08/19/air-force-establishes-%e2%80%98reduced%e2%80%99-cyber-war-command/</link>
		<comments>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/08/19/air-force-establishes-%e2%80%98reduced%e2%80%99-cyber-war-command/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 02:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stexas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[H@xor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/08/19/air-force-establishes-%e2%80%98reduced%e2%80%99-cyber-war-command/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Air Force Establishes ‘Reduced’ Cyber-War Command]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/08/19/air-force-establishes-%e2%80%98reduced%e2%80%99-cyber-war-command/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Military May Ban Twitter, Facebook as Security ‘Headaches’</title>
		<link>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/08/03/military-may-ban-twitter-facebook-as-security-%e2%80%98headaches%e2%80%99/</link>
		<comments>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/08/03/military-may-ban-twitter-facebook-as-security-%e2%80%98headaches%e2%80%99/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 22:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stexas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[H@xor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/08/03/military-may-ban-twitter-facebook-as-security-%e2%80%98headaches%e2%80%99/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Military May Ban Twitter, Facebook as Security ‘Headaches’]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/08/03/military-may-ban-twitter-facebook-as-security-%e2%80%98headaches%e2%80%99/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cyber Co&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/07/08/cyber-cos/</link>
		<comments>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/07/08/cyber-cos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stexas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[H@xor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/07/08/cyber-cos/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[StratCom wants DoD cyber units joined The Launching of U.S. Cyber Command (CYBERCOM) Cyber command in urgent need of strategy Cyber Can Kill SAMs]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/07/08/cyber-cos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Project delays not putting GPS at risk, says Air Force</title>
		<link>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/05/22/project-delays-not-putting-gps-at-risk-says-air-force/</link>
		<comments>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/05/22/project-delays-not-putting-gps-at-risk-says-air-force/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 02:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stexas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/05/22/project-delays-not-putting-gps-at-risk-says-air-force/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Military projects are infamous for delays and cost overruns. Ditto for just about everything we put into space. Combine the two in the form of military space programs and you would presumably have a recipe for disaster. So it&#8217;s no surprise to learn that various military satellite programs have been plagued with problems, many of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/05/22/project-delays-not-putting-gps-at-risk-says-air-force/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law of Armed Conflict To Apply To Cyberwar</title>
		<link>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/05/09/law-of-armed-conflict-to-apply-to-cyberwar/</link>
		<comments>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/05/09/law-of-armed-conflict-to-apply-to-cyberwar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 14:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stexas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[H@xor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/05/09/law-of-armed-conflict-to-apply-to-cyberwar/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gen. Kevin Chilton, the head of STRATCOM, just declared that the Law of Armed Conflict will apply to cyberwar, and that the US won&#8217;t rule out conventional (read: kinetic) responses to cyber-attacks. This means that we consider state-supported &#8216;hackers&#8217; to be subject to the Geneva Conventions and Customary International Law, including the rules of proportionality [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/05/09/law-of-armed-conflict-to-apply-to-cyberwar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We Don&#8217;t Want To Run U.S. Cybersecurity Efforts, NSA Chief Says</title>
		<link>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/04/21/we-dont-want-to-run-us-cybersecurity-efforts-nsa-chief-says/</link>
		<comments>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/04/21/we-dont-want-to-run-us-cybersecurity-efforts-nsa-chief-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stexas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H@xor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/04/21/we-dont-want-to-run-us-cybersecurity-efforts-nsa-chief-says/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[From We Don't Want To Run U.S. Cybersecurity Efforts, NSA Chief Says]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/04/21/we-dont-want-to-run-us-cybersecurity-efforts-nsa-chief-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Data stolen from US Joint Strike Fighter project</title>
		<link>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/04/21/data-stolen-from-us-joint-strike-fighter-project/</link>
		<comments>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/04/21/data-stolen-from-us-joint-strike-fighter-project/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stexas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[H@xor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/04/21/data-stolen-from-us-joint-strike-fighter-project/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal is reporting that cyber-spies have stolen several terabytes of data from the Joint Strike Fighter project [From Data stolen from US Joint Strike Fighter project]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/04/21/data-stolen-from-us-joint-strike-fighter-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese Submarine Patrol increase in 2008</title>
		<link>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/02/05/chinese-submarine-patrol-increase-in-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/02/05/chinese-submarine-patrol-increase-in-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 03:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stexas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Submarines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/02/05/chinese-submarine-patrol-increase-in-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is kind of an interesting piece of news. If you remember, a lot of hoopla came out when US naval intelligence said that China only conducted 2 submarine patrols in 2006. There was a lot of discussion on what defined a patrol after that came out. As the article below states, Chinese submarine activity [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://anyhat.net/blog/2009/02/05/chinese-submarine-patrol-increase-in-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Russia pushes India SSN lease deal</title>
		<link>http://anyhat.net/blog/2008/12/23/russia-pushes-india-ssn-lease-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://anyhat.net/blog/2008/12/23/russia-pushes-india-ssn-lease-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stexas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Submarines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anyhat.net/blog/2008/12/23/russia-pushes-india-ssn-lease-deal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This story from Reuters-India tells us that Russian President Medvedev is talking up the possibility of leasing not only the ill-fated Nerpa but &#8216;several&#8217; Project-971 submarines to India, for 10-year leases. Although there isn&#8217;t any press on India&#8217;s response to this &#8211; the Nerpa deal was on, off, on, etc. after the recent accident &#8211; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://anyhat.net/blog/2008/12/23/russia-pushes-india-ssn-lease-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

