Civil liberties vs. national security
Hannibal, who covers the technological and social aspects of national security for Ars, also weighs in with his own thoughts, and provides some historical context for the debate…. Clearly, the deterrence value of the threat of incarceration is exactly zero to a suicide bomber, so in that respect the criminal justice system is quite poorly equipped to prevent terrorism…. In the age of nuclear and biological terrorism, Posner argued, we can’t really afford a “terrorism rate,” even if that rate is really low…. The issues that the three panelists—all important figures in their respective areas of law—addressed are among the weightiest and timeliest problems that we face today. Read on to get a full sense of the contours and direction of the civil liberties vs. national security debate from three of that debate’s most knowledgeable voices.